Structure-Based and Computer-Aided Drug
Design
H. Kubinyi
In the past decade, genomics, combinatorial chemistry, molecular modelling,
and high-throughput screening developed as new strategies in drug research.
Drug targets result from the human genome. The validation of a new target
for therapy is performed in genetically modified animals. Ten thousands to
hundred thousands compounds are synthesised, in parallel, and are tested in
automated high-throughput screening systems. However, the success rate of
these approaches is only modest.
With the ongoing progress in protein crystallography, rational approaches
in drug design become more and more important. Several examples of the structure-based
design of marketed drugs and drug candidates being in clinical development
illustrate the potential of this technique. Whereas structure-based design
can be regarded as the predominant strategy of the last decade, computer-assisted
drug research is a recent development for the de novo design of protein ligands.
If thousands of candidates and even larger structural databases shall be tested
whether certain members are suited to be ligands of a protein binding site,
this cannot any longer be done by hand. The process has to be automated, i.e.
performed with the help of the computer. Computer programs for this purpose
are e.g. DOCK and LUDI.
Compound collections of pharmaceutical companies and natural products are
biased towards biologically active compounds. On the other hand, combinatorial
libraries and compounds offered by commercial vendors need a proper selection
of sublibraries and/or candidates that have the potential to be biologically
active. "Drug-like~ properties, "lead-like" character, oral bioavailability,
and sufficient metabolic stability are preconditions for valuable leads and
are more important than the chemical accessibility of a library. An interesting
approach to determine the ~drug-likeness~ of series of organic molecules,
based on a neural net evaluation, has been developed at BASF. Other tools
for filtering compound libraries, to enrich them with biologically active
compounds, and the selection of "best" sublibraries from huge virtual libraries
will be discussed.
Computer methods, like the flexible docking program FlexX, and experimental
methods, like the SAR by NMR method and the dynamic assembly of ligands within
the binding site of a protein pave the way to a combinatorial design of protein
ligands. Several research institutions and pharmaceutical companies are now
going to develop dedicated computer programs for the structure-based design
of ligands from selected building blocks, by combinatorial construction within
their binding site. In this manner, out of a virtual library of billions of
possible ligands only those shall be selected for synthesis and testing, which
smoothly fit the binding site, in geometry as well as in their properties.
Whereas all necessary tools for this purpose are already developed, a correct
ranking of the intermediate solutions and the final results according to their
estimated binding affinity is still very difficult. Reliable scoring functions
for this purpose have to be developed.
|
|