|
 |
IBM Enterprise Privacy Architecture (EPA)
|
Enterprises use privacy statements to promise privacy to customers
and to set up their internal policies for dealing with employee
and other personal data. The focus of this work is a comprehensive
methodology for managing and enforcing these promises throughout
an enterprise.
This includes three main elements:
| 1. |
An overall architecture for enterprise privacy. |
| 2. |
A formal language for formalizing privacy policies, together
with suitable operations for typical usage. |
| 3. |
An architecture for privacy enforcement throughout an enterprise. |
We will now describe these building blocks in
more detail.
The
IBM Enterprise Privacy Architecture is a methodology for enterprises
to provide an enhanced and well-defined level of privacy to their
customers. This includes privacy-friendly business processes, privacy-enabling
security technology, and enterprise privacy management.
Privacy-friendly business processes are derived from ordinary business
processes by minimizing the data needed to provide the desired services.
This may include switching to equivalent service alternatives that
require less personal data. It may also utilize privacy-enabled
security technology.
Even with privacy-friendly business processes and security technology,
enterprises still collect a certain amount of personal data. In
order to protect the privacy of the consumers, a privacy-enabled
enterprise will promise fair information practices to its customers.
These are stated in a privacy policy and can be formalized using
P3P. Enterprise privacy management is a privacy-enabled way to manage
the collected data of an enterprise while enforcing the privacy
promises that have already been made.
IBM Enterprise Privacy Authorization Language (EPAL)
EPAL
and Submission
to W3C, 2003.
One part of our research is to develop a formal language for defining
enterprise privacy practices. Enterprises promise a certain level
of privacy to their customers using privacy statements or the Platform
for Privacy Preferences (P3P). The formal language can then be used
to formalize these promises. By automated enforcement of these enterprise-specific
privacy practices, enterprises are able to uphold the promises they
have made.
A privacy policy describes the privacy practices as well as the
opt-in and opt-out choices of an individual. Policies are then associated
with all data collected by an enterprise. This "sticky policy paradigm"
mandates that the policy sticks to the data, travels with it, and
can be used to decide how the data can be used. By separating application-
and enterprise-dependent deployment information from the actual
policies, E-P3P policies can be used to control the flow and usage
of data within and among enterprises.
The sticky policy paradigm necessitates certain operations on the
policies of an enterprise, such as comparing whether data can be
forwarded to another enterprise that has its own policy. We develop
a toolbox of such operations.
Component architecture for enforcing privacy policies
Another part of our research is to define an architecture that
enforces policies throughout an enterprise. This includes a policy
evaluation engine as well as privacy-enabled resource monitors that
enforce the policy for a variety of resources.
|
 |
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
| [1] |
M. Hondo, T. Nadalin, R. Nagaratnam, M. Kudo, G. Karjoth,
B. Pfitzmann, M. Schunter
Position Paper: Privacy Policies as a Component of Policy-enabled
Governance; W3C
Workshop on Languages for Privacy Policy Negotiation and
Semantics-Driven Enforcement, Oct. 2006. |
| [2] |
Ch. Vanden Berghe, M. Schunter
Privacy Injector - Automated Privacy Enforcement Through Aspects;
Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2006, 99-117. |
| [3] |
M. Nelson, M. Schunter, M. McCullough, J. Bliss
Trust on Demand -- Enabling Privacy, Security, Transparency,
and Accountability in Distributed Systems; 33rd Research Conference
on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), Sept.
2005, Arlington, USA. |
| [4] |
M. Backes, M. Duermuth, R. Steinwandt
An Algebra for Composing Enterprise Privacy Policies, 9th European
Symposium on Research in Computer Security (ESORICS 2004), LNCS
3193, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2004, 33-52. |
| [5] |
M. Backes, M. Duermuth, G. Karjoth
Unification in Privacy Policy Evaluation - Translating EPAL
to Prolog. 5th IEEE Intern. Workshop on Policies for Distributed
Systems and Networks (POLICY), 2004. |
| [6] |
M. Backes, W. Bagga, G. Karjoth, M. Schunter
Efficient Comparison of Enterprise Privacy Policies, to appear
19th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Special Track "Security",
Nicosia, Cyprus, March 2004. |
| [7] |
M. Backes, B. Pfitzmann, M. Schunter
A Toolkit for Managing Enterprise Privacy Policies, 8th
European Symposium on Research in Computer Security (ESORICS
2003), LNCS 2808, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2003, 162-180. copyright
Springer-Verlag, Berling Heidelberg 2003.
Won Award for Outstanding
Research in Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2004. |
| [8] |
G. Karjoth, M. Schunter, E. Van Herreweghen, M. Waidner
Amending P3P for Clearer Privacy Promises; Trust and Privacy
in Digital Business -- TrustBus 03. In 14th Intíl Workshop on
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), IEEE Press,
Prague, 2003, 445-449. |
| [9] |
G. Karjoth, M. Schunter, E. Van Herreweghen
Enterprise Privacy Practices vs. Privacy Promises -- How to
Promise What You Can Keep; 4th IEEE International Workshop on
Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (Policy ’03),
2003, 135-146. |
| [10] |
P. Ashley, M. Schunter
The Platform for Enterprise Privacy Practices, Information Security
Solutions Europe (ISSE), Paris, 2002.v |
| [11] |
P. Ashley, M. Schunter, C. Powers
From Privacy Promises to Privacy Management --- A New Approach
for Enforcing Privacy Throughout an Enterprise, ACM New Security
Paradigms Workshop (NSPW), Virginia Beach VA, 2002. |
| [12] |
G. Karjoth, M. Schunter
A Privacy Policy Model for Enterprises, 15th IEEE Computer Security
Foundations Workshop, Toronto, 2002. |
| [13] |
G. Karjoth, M. Schunter, M. Waidner
Platform for Enterprise Privacy Practices, Privacy-enhancing
Technologies (PET), San Francisco, 2002. |
| [14] |
G. Karjoth, M. Schunter, M. Waidner
Privacy-enabled Services for Enterprises; Workshop on Trust
and Privacy in e-Business (TrustBus), Aix-en-Provence, 2002. |
| [15] |
G. Karjoth, M. Schunter, M. Waidner
Unternehmensweites Datenschutzmanagement; In "Datenschutz als
Wettbewerbsvorteil", Vieweg, 2002. |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
|
|